Funding Sources for our Programs Site Index Home
About Us Curriculum Teacher Resources Student Resources
Newsletters & Publications Search

media, persuasion, bias, stereotype, body image, logo, slogan, message, audience anatomy, hearing disorder, amplification, caregiving, hearing handicap inventory, audiogram, auditory pathway, auditory cortex, temporal lobe, decibel, sound wave, vibration, amplitude anatomy, detached retina, macular degeneration, glaucoma, hemianopsia, cataract, diabetic retinopathy, visual acuity, visual field, depth perception, visual pathway, optic nerve, occipital lobe, visual cortex, depth perception, presbyopia, myopia, astigmatism, hyperopia sleep habit, sleep pattern, sleep deprivation, sleep disorder, nightlight, light pollution research, organize, graphic organizer, Big 6, strategy, source, synthesis, evaluation lung, diaphragm, breath, pollutant, air quality anatomy, brushing technique, calcium, calculus, demineralization, caries, flossing technique, fluoride, oral hygiene, plaque fat minder, calorie, energy balance, body fat, Archimedes Principle, mass, volume, density, exercise, physical activity adolescent nutrition, activity level, algorithm, analysis, basal metabolism rate, body mass index, caloric intake, caloric need, energy balance, energy need, fad diet, nomogram, obesity, overweight, dietary guideline food group, food pyramid, recommended serving, classifying, combination food, nutrition mobility, movement, physics, gait, gait cycle, laboratory, chart, graph, calculate, mobility compromise, balance, sway, stabilometer stereotype, ageism, media, book analysis, poetry personal narrative, personal milestone, lifeline, timeline, family tree, past, present, future levers, effort, move, joint, movement, resistance, force interviewing, biography, timeline, lifeline, research, note taking, historical context spreadsheets, computer skills, sampling, data analyses, graphing, scattergrams, calculations, mean, statistics, median, mode, range idioms, culture, language, aging themes, translations health career, job arteries, anatomy, atherosclerosis, stroke, pulmonary embolism, heart attack, organ damage, aneurysm brain, anatomy, dementia, neural function, sensory, motor, homunculus, cerebrum, cerebellum, memory, learning style glucose, blood sugar, insulin, pancreas, hypoglycemia, glucose tolerance test, atherosclerosis, nutrition, obesity, thrifty gene statistic, population, percentage, longevity, life expectancy, life span, graph, map, population pyramid, entrepreneurship mobility, movement, physics, gait, gait cycle, laboratory, chart, graph, calculate, mobility compromise, balance, sway, stabilometer blood, blood transfusion, scientist, timeline, history, scientific knowledge, blood type, blood supply, organ, organ donation, plasma, blood disorder

Get Adobe Reader

 

 

Evaluation Strategies

Curriculum Evaluation  
bullet Qualitative Evaluation

     Student Drawings & Sentence Completions

     Teacher and Student Opinions (student grade cards)
bullet Quantitative Evaluation

     Student Pre/Post Knowledge Tests

   
Rubrics  
bullet Rubrics Overview

bullet Processing Out Grading Rubric

bullet Classroom Learner Rubrics

bullet Scaled Scores Rubric

bullet Process Skill Rubrics

 
   

 

 

 

Qualitative Evaluation of the Curriculum
Student Drawings & Sentence Completions - Under the Positively Aging® project's NIH SEPA grant (1997-2000), the effectiveness of the curriculum was evaluated. A controlled trial evaluation was conducted in the 1998-1999 school year with two participating middle schools in San Antonio TX. One school served as the control school (did not use the Positively Aging ® materials) and the other was the implementation school (did use the Positively Aging ® materials).

Qualitative methods included using children's drawings of older people and sentence completion exercises. These were used to capture changes in children's views on aging. It was found that the implementation school data showed an increase in positive views and a decrease in negative views while data from the control school remained constant. Data findings were statistically significant and demonstrated that the Positively Aging ® materials can move children to a more positive view of aging. Read more under our Peer Reviewed Publications link.

You may download our coding sheet and instructions:

"Help the N.I.A." Drawing Activity (Read more about this activity.)
Student Handout Coding Sheet Coding Instructions
     
Sentence Completion Activity (Read more about this activity.)
Teacher Handout Coding Sheet Coding Instructions

 

top

 

Qualitative Evaluation of the Curriculum
Teacher & Student Opinions
- One way to qualitatively evaluate the curriculum and program is to ask the opinions of teachers and students. Read some quotes from teachers and students here.

Student Grade Cards - Another alternate for curriculum evaluation is for the students themselves to evaluate the curriculum! Explain to your students that they always receive grades for their work, now is their chance to grade the lesson. They can give the lesson/activity an A, B, C, D or F and explain why it deserves this grade. Teachers can collect the grade cards and analyze the comments for patterns or common themes. You may download a sample student grade card here.

See what students thought of these activities:
Bone Unit - OsCosts® Game Read more about this activity
Cardiovascular Unit - Inflamm-O-Wars Game Read more about this activity
Diabetes Unit - Sedentary Stan Read more about this activity
Levers in Body Unit - Levers in Body Read more about this activity
Pulmonary Unit - Anatomy of Breathing Read more about this activity
Pulmonary Unit - Pom Pom Shooters Read more about this activity
Pulmonary Unit - Slicin' & Dicin' Read more about this activity
Pulmonary Unit - It's No Fun Being on Restriction Read more about this activity

 

top

 

Quantitative Evaluation of the Curriculum
Student Pre/Post Knowledge Tests
- Units and activities are evaluated with pre/post knowledge tests. This is an ongoing process and not all units or activities have corresponding tests.

The following are some examples of pre/post test results.

Blood Unit - Inheritance of Blood Types Read more about this activity
Bone Unit - Lessons 2, 4, & 5 Read more about this activity
Bone Unit - OsCosts® Game Read more about this activity
Cardiovascular Unit - Inflamm-O-Wars Game Read more about this activity
Cardiovascular Unit - Dire Progress Read more about this activity
Diabetes Unit - Sedentary Stan Read more about this activity
Levers in Body Unit - Levers in the Body Read more about this activity
Population Demographics Unit - Entire Unit Read more about this activity
Pulmonary Unit - Pom Pom Shooter Read more about this activity
Pulmonary Unit - Slicin' & Dicin' Read more about this activity

top

 

Rubrics Overview

To assist teachers with evaluating their students, rubrics are provided as examples of how to assess the quality of the work and processes by which the children are learning. The percentage grade applied to each rubric may vary with the skills being tested, the format for the activity (oral vs. written), and the time of year the questions and activities are used. The evaluation rubrics may be weighted to obtain a percentage grade by applying different scales - examples of scaled scores are also provided in this section.

Introduction: Evaluating the effectiveness of the curricular materials and changes in the students' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs is central to accomplishing the objectives of the Positively Aging ® lessons. In this lesson, we provide some examples of evaluation rubrics you may use in your classroom to assess your students. A rubric is a guideline with specified criteria for assessing the abilities and knowledge of your students. The rubrics are shared with the students before the activities so that they will understand how they are being tested and evaluated. The rubrics provided here are meant as suggestions. Teachers may adapt their own evaluation rubrics for assessing their students when using the Positively Aging ® instructional material.

To the Students: "The following are copies of some of the evaluation rubrics we will use with the Positively Aging ® teaching material this year. A rubric is a system that allows you to know what is expected of you and how you are learning, improving, and progressing in class. Before each learning activity, you will be told which scaled rubric (score) we will use and what skills we will be evaluating. As your teacher, I believe you will appreciate this method of grading your skills. So often, you do many of these things well but are not given credit for them. Enjoy!"

Top

Classroom Learner Rubrics

Reflection: "Without help, write down the (concepts, exercises, or observations) we made together in class yesterday."

0 = None written
1 = Incorrect Information
2 = 1 correct item
3 = 2 or more correctly recalled items

Participation - Group Checklist : Does the Student:

Ask questions?
Make appropriate comments?
Take notes?
Complete tasks?

Participation - General:

0 = Does not participate
1 =

Participates inappropriately (specific rules for participation set prior to each activity)
2 = Participates appropriately for assigned task

Contributions to the Group Checklist : Does the student:

Ask questions for the group?
Keep the group on task?
Encourage others?


Group Skills and Participation:

0 = Interferes with group
1 =
Does not participate
2 = Participates some of the time
3 = Always participates

Group Skills and Cooperation: 

0 = Does not contribute to the group
1 =
Sometimes contributes
2 = Consistently contributes to the group

Top

Process Skill Rubrics

The most common process skills require that students be able to use a broad range of content knowledge to:

1. Identify problems
2. Formulate hypotheses
3. Design experiments
4. Make observations
5. Collect data
6. Organize data
7. Interpret data
8. Formulate conclusions
9. Classify and generalize
10. Make predictions
11. Report results

Examples for rubrics for some of these process skills include:

Understanding the Problem:

0 = Student fails to restate problem in own words
1 = Student restates problem but misinterprets
2 =

Student restates problem and demonstrates correct understanding

Designing the Experiment:

0 = No experimental design
1 = No comparison of variables
2 = Comparison made but lacking data collection
3 = Comparison made with sufficient data collection

Making Observations:

0 = No observations made
1 = Only 1 or 2 observations made
2 = 3 or more observations made
3 = 3 or more observations made with supporting data collection

Data Collecting and Reporting:

0 = Student fails to collect any data
1 = Student describes observations in a disjointed manner
2 = Student produces data tables without meaningful labels
3 =

Student produces data tables with meaningful labels, but inaccurate recording of data
4 =

Student produces data tables with meaningful labels and accurate recording of data

Drawing Conclusions:

0 = No conclusions made
1 = Conclusions made but not supported by data
2 =

Conclusions supported by data by student fails to present the evidence
3 =

Conclusions supported by the data and student provides evidence

Making Predictions:

0 = Student makes no predictions
1 = Student makes one prediction
2 = Student makes one prediction per observation
3 =

Student makes one prediction per observation and the prediction is accurate/correct

Top

Processing Out Grading Rubric

0 = No Response from student.
1 =

Student response does not answer question or parts to a question are not answered.
2 =

Student answers questions without supportive detail; student may or may not respond in complete sentences.
3 =

Student processed questions with some supportive detail; student may or may not respond in complete sentences.
4 =

Student processed questions thoughtfully with supportive detail but did not answer in complete sentences.
5 =


Student processed questions thoughtfully with supportive detail or justification and the responses were written in complete sentences.

Top

Scaled Scores Rubric

In addition to the rubrics noted above, scaled scores may be provided to weight the numerical values. These weights may then be used to provide traditional averages based on a 0-100 rating scale. Students should be aware of the scaling values assigned to the rubric numbers. Examples of different scaling schemes are provided in the following table.

Rubric Score Scale wt 1 Scale wt 2 Scale wt 3 Scale wt 4
0 0 0 0 0
1 60 60 60 60
2 80 75 80 75
3 100 85 90 90
4   100 100 95
5       100

Teachers are encouraged to develop and utilize their own scaling as their classroom needs evolve.

Top

 

   
UTHSCSA Teacher Enrichment Initiatives
Positively Aging® & M.O.R.E. Curricular Programs
2007-2008 © The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Homepage: http://teachhealthk-12.uthscsa.edu